@pipeworx/cn-safe-penalties

Connect: https://pipeworx.io/mcp — every tool in the catalog, including @pipeworx/cn-safe-penalties’s. Install: one-click buttons

No MCP client? Skip the connection: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs {"query":"..."} to find a tool below, GET /v1/tools/<name> for its schema, POST the same URL with arguments for the data — see For AI agents.

Tools: 2

Has China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange (国家外汇管理局) publicly named this firm in a foreign-exchange violation case: for what conduct, under which article, and with what fine or confiscation? Rows are the Administration’s published notices of foreign-exchange violation cases (外汇违规案例的通报), read from its release list. Firms and banks only.

Tools

• cn_safe_violation_notices_search(query?, page?, limit?) — one call reads one page of the Administration’s newest-first release list (about 20 releases per page, 64 pages), picks the violation-case notices on it and reads up to limit (1-3) of them. Each firm case gives the case title, the entity, the conduct as the Administration describes it, the penalty text and the link to the official notice. query is Chinese text matched only within the cases of the notices read (the publisher offers no keyword search); page moves back in time. Also returns searched (page, pages_total, the dates the page covers, how many violation notices the page holds and how many were read, titles not read), individual_cases_omitted, unclassified_cases_omitted, person_sentences_omitted, unread_notices and data_as_of.
• cn_safe_violation_notice_get(notice_url, query?) — reads one notice in full (firm cases only), from a notice_url returned by the search.

Auth

Keyless.

Data sources

• State Administration of Foreign Exchange (国家外汇管理局), notices of foreign-exchange violation cases (外汇违规案例的通报), published several times a year since 2018. Read from the publisher on each call; nothing is stored.

Individuals are not returned

The notices mix companies, banks and natural persons. A case against a natural person is left out and counted (individual_cases_omitted). A case that cannot be classified as a firm or a person is left out and counted (unclassified_cases_omitted). Sentences inside a firm case that name a person are dropped and counted (person_sentences_omitted). Every response carries a note saying so; the tests prove that a person’s name never appears in a response.

Behaviour worth knowing

• Violation notices are a few a year among many releases, so the newest page often holds none (empty_reason: no_violation_notice_on_this_page). Walk page; the response names the dates each page covers. No match is never evidence that a firm was not penalised.
• A notice that cannot be read is counted in unread_notices and reported as empty_reason: unread, never as an empty result. A changed page layout or an error page is an upstream_down error.
• These notices are a selection of typical cases chosen by the Administration, not a complete register of penalties; the Administration’s regional branches publish their own decisions elsewhere.
• Text is the Administration’s own wording, in simplified Chinese.

Tools

• cn_safe_violation_notices_search — Search the State Administration of Foreign Exchange’s published notices of foreign-exchange violation cases (国家外汇管理局关于外汇违规案例的通报): the firms and banks penalised for illegal currency dealing through und
• cn_safe_violation_notice_get — Read one State Administration of Foreign Exchange violation-case notice in full (firm cases only): each firm case with its title, the entity, the conduct described by the publisher and the penalty tex