@pipeworx/insurance-denials
Connect: https://gateway.pipeworx.io/insurance-denials/mcp · Install: one-click buttons
Tools: 4
US health-insurance claim denial rates and appeal outcomes, per insurer — which companies deny the most claims, and whether appealing one actually works.
Tools
| Tool | Answers |
|---|---|
insurer_denial_rates | Which insurers deny the most claims, ranked by in-network denial rate. Filter by state and market. |
insurer_appeal_outcomes | What share of appeals get overturned in the patient’s favour, internal and external. |
insurer_denial_profile | Everything reported for one named insurer, forgiving about how the name is written. |
insurer_denial_coverage | What is in scope — plan year, issuer and state counts, and how much CMS suppressed. |
Auth
None. No key, no account.
Data sources
The CMS Transparency in Coverage Public Use File, plan year 2026, published by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services:
- Landing page: https://www.cms.gov/marketplace/resources/data/public-use-files
- File: https://download.cms.gov/marketplace-puf/2026/transparency-in-coverage-puf.zip
Issuers report these figures to CMS themselves under 45 CFR 156.220. CMS publishes the file once a year, as an XLSX inside a ZIP.
What this covers, and what it does not
Two limits, both easy to mistake for a data bug:
HealthCare.gov states only — 30 of them. An issuer on a state-run exchange
(California, New York, Massachusetts, Washington, Colorado, Pennsylvania, New
Jersey and others) reports to that state, not into this federal file. A caller
asking about California gets an explicit state_not_in_source refusal naming
the reason, rather than an empty list that would read as “California insurers
deny nothing”.
Self-reported. These are the issuers’ own counts, and CMS says so in the file’s own disclaimer. They are not an audit.
Reading the numbers
- Dental denies far more than medical. Standalone dental plans
(
Individual SADP) sit at the top of any unfiltered denial ranking — several above 70%. Passmarket: "medical"when the question is about medical cover, or the answer will be true and misleading. - Suppressed is not zero. CMS marks a figure it cannot publish with
*or**. Those arenullhere, never0— a suppressed denial count reported as zero would describe a perfect insurer. - Internal and external appeals differ. Internal appeals are decided by the insurer that issued the denial; external appeals go to an independent reviewer. The external number is the arm’s-length one.
- One filing per state. A multi-state insurer reports separately in each
state, so
insurer_denial_profilereturns one entry per state rather than a single national figure. marketsis a scope label, not a slice. CMS publishes these counts per ISSUER, not per market, and an issuer selling both medical and dental files the same totals in both sheets (25 of 348 do). Somarketslists which marketplaces an issuer participates in, and filtering by market chooses which issuers to include — it does not carve up their claim counts.
Refreshing
Annual, when CMS publishes the next plan year:
node scripts/refresh-insurance-denials.mjs # rewrites src/data.json
The script re-reads the CMS file and rolls it up to issuer level. It dedupes
by issuer id and never sums: the Issuer_* columns repeat identically on
every plan row an issuer has, so summing multiplies each figure by that
issuer’s plan count. Verified when the pack was built — 0 of 185 issuer ids
varied across their own rows. It also emits one record per issuer, merging
the market sheets an issuer appears in, for the same reason: those rows carry
identical totals, and one row per sheet duplicated 25 issuers in every ranking.
Tools
- insurer_denial_rates — Which health insurers deny the most claims — US marketplace issuers ranked by the share of in-network claims they denied, for plan year ${PLAN_YEAR}. Answers “what percentage of claims does my insuran
- insurer_appeal_outcomes — Does appealing a denied health-insurance claim work? Marketplace issuers ranked by the share of appeals that were OVERTURNED in the patient’s favour, plan year ${PLAN_YEAR}. Answers “is it worth appea
- insurer_denial_profile — Everything reported for ONE named health insurer: claims received and denied in and out of network, the denial rate, and both internal and external appeal outcomes, for plan year ${PLAN_YEAR}. Use whe
- insurer_denial_coverage — What this data covers before you rely on it: the plan year, how many issuers and states are present, which states are included, and the counts of issuers whose denial or appeal figures CMS suppressed.
Tools
-
insurer_appeal_outcomes— Does appealing a denied health-insurance claim work? Marketplace issuers ranked by the share of appeals that were OVERTURNED in the patient's favour, plan year ${PLAN_YEAR}. Answers is it worth appeal -
insurer_denial_coverage— What this data covers before you rely on it: the plan year, how many issuers and states are present, which states are included, and the counts of issuers whose denial or appeal figures CMS suppressed. -
insurer_denial_profile— Everything reported for ONE named health insurer: claims received and denied in and out of network, the denial rate, and both internal and external appeal outcomes, for plan year ${PLAN_YEAR}. Use whe -
insurer_denial_rates— Which health insurers deny the most claims — US marketplace issuers ranked by the share of in-network claims they denied, for plan year ${PLAN_YEAR}. Answers what percentage of claims does my insuranc